“When you start working on a topic, you feel like swimming in an ocean, and without a boat” – 5in10 with Gülşah Başkavak

Gülşah Başkavak is a sociologist, specializing in sociology of medicine and sociology of work. She received her PhD in Sociology from the Middle East Technical University (METU) in Ankara, with a dissertation entitled “Understanding Surgical Craft in The Changing Context of Technology, Transformation of Healthcare and Marketization: A Case Study on Surgeons in Istanbul, Turkey”. Her academic interests focus mainly on medicine-technology relationship, technological transformation and work, science and technology studies (STS), crafts and craftsmanship, occupations and professions. Since February 2019 Başkavak is a research associate at the Orient-Institut Istanbul (OII), where she is conducting a research project that investigates socio-cultural practices of e-health and self-tracking technologies in Turkey.

How do you explain your current research projects to your students?

My current research interests focus on digitalization in the field of health and illness. I am currently conducting a qualitative study on the practices of self-tracking devices in Turkey from a socio-cultural perspective. The focus is particularly on how individuals are monitoring their health through self-tracking technologies. In addition, the extent of empowerment these devices provide as well as the barriers individuals encounter in accessing and using such technologies is crucial. Turkey, with its heterogeneous population, provides a significant case for studying the opportunities for access to medical technologies and digital devices or the frequency and other characteristics of related practices. As our research is part of a broader research on eHealth in Germany (project partner and principle: Prof. Dr. Stefan Selke, Furtwangen University), our findings are significant for understanding similarities and differences in Turkish and German eHealth practices. This is a pioneering study for Turkey, in that sense, as there is almost no other sociological research on the topic (for more information, please visit: https://www.oiist.org/en/mensch-medizin-und-gesellschaft/).

One of the major questions of the study is, for instance, which groups are more involved in using self-tracking technologies providing digital health data? Investigation of the social and cultural aspects of digital health may provide significant contribution to the fields of both STS and Sociology of Medicine. The study is also valuable, as it may provide a basis for a longitudinal study in Turkey. In short, I consider it significant to observe and research the practices and impacts of digitalization in medicine and health. As a social scientist, examining the interaction of medicine and technology is a topic that I am very much glad to be involved in.

What were academic or personal inspirations that led to your current research?

I have a background in economics and labor economics in particular. The concepts of work and labor have always been a point of focus for me at both macro and micro levels. Then technology has been added to these. Starting with my master’s thesis, I became curious about the work-technology relationship, questioning the effects of technology on the labor process and organizations. How are professions evolving in response to the advancement of information and communication technologies? What are the changes in the concept of skill in this process of transformation (upgrade or deskilling) and how is the manual-mental labor distinction effected? What about the craft dimension in many forms of work, is that being dissolved or maintained? I continued my interest in the topic further in my PhD. Also inspired by the lively atmosphere at Middle East Technical University, I was happy to combine my interest in technology and professions with the sociology of health and medicine. My dissertation was an investigation of the surgical work, inquiring the interaction of craftsmanship aspect of surgery with the changes in medical technologies. With regard to its conceptual focus and case selection, I can say that it is a pioneering study. In the dissertation, I studied the changes in the craft aspect of surgical work in reaction to the changes in the three sphere of medical technology, healthcare system and market dynamics. A combined background in both economics and sociology allow me to problematize macro and micro dynamics simultaneously within a single research framework. I am deeply attracted to direct my attention on the social impact of technological change towards medicine and professions related to it. This is a constant inspiration for my further research.

How are you ‘doing’ research? What are your most important research methods (interviews, archives, excavations…?)

In use qualitative methods and I feel personally inclined to this type of methodology. I tend to think that an ethnographic approach and techniques such as in-depth interviews and participant observations are useful in both allowing “understanding” or “interpreting” most research questions as well providing more freedom to the researcher. I admire C. W. Mills’ concept of “social imagination” and recognize the importance of experience in reading between the lines in the responses given to in-depth interviews and realizing the fuzzy background. It also requires a certain level of empathy, without hampering, of course, personal caution and objectivity. I should also add that, as part of the current project I am working on, I started to follow social media outlets created or followed by patients with chronic diseases, especially those related to the use of self-tracking technologies. This is a new and exciting venue of research for me.

Which publications or academic events (workshops, conferences, lecture series…) did inspire you recently?

Currently working on digitalization in health and medicine, I am particularly inspired by the works of Deborah Lupton. When you start working on a topic that you are familiar with but not completely informed, you feel like swimming in an ocean, and without a boat. But in time, that huge body of water starts to narrow down, becoming more like a lake. And now you have a boat, also a compass … and you start feeling more confident and competent. This is how I feel when I start a new research.

Sociology of Medicine is a newly developing subfield in Turkey, and there are some really exciting works, particularly on experiences of illness and the encounter of individuals with new medical technologies. While still relatively few in quantity, this is a literature I am closely following. Also, with a group of colleagues I am involved in the preparation of a special issue as a contribution to this literature. We have organized a special session on e-health at the STS TURKEY conference held on September 10-12 in Istanbul. At the OII, especially in the “Human, Medicine and Society” research area, we are working in an extremely inspiring and supporting academic environment.

Do you think that academic mobility changes the way in which research projects are conceptualized? What are your personal experiences in this regard?

During my PhD I attended the Humboldt University of Berlin for an academic year, which was a very valuable experience for me, enriching me in various ways. Working at Orient-Institut Istanbul as a local employee, while living in in my home country, I am involved in a completely international academic environment. I consider this a great opportunity, an extremely fruitful and enriching capability. There is continuous activity at our institute, putting me in contact with scholars with a variety of perspectives, research agendas and cultural backgrounds; and I benefit greatly from learning about different conceptual and theoretical approaches in formulating research projects and the methodologies used. In an international environment like this, sharing your own research leads to new openings as you are faced with questions and comments from very different angles, adding much to your thinking. Colloquia are especially functional in that regard as they provide a platform for discussing different approaches and modifying our own. Even small talks during coffee breaks may inspire new topics for an article or project. I can already list three new research ideas, all developed in these coffee breaks. I consider myself really lucky to be part of this lively atmosphere of the Orient-Institut Istanbul.

Citation: “When you start working on a topic, you feel like swimming in an ocean, and without a boat” – 5in10 with Gülşah Başkavak”, in: TRAFO – Blog for Transregional Research, 22.10.2019, https://trafo.hypotheses.org/19828


OpenEdition schlägt Ihnen vor, diesen Beitrag wie folgt zu zitieren:
Editorial Board (22. Oktober 2019). “When you start working on a topic, you feel like swimming in an ocean, and without a boat” – 5in10 with Gülşah Başkavak. TRAFO – Blog for Transregional Research. Abgerufen am 18. Juli 2024 von https://doi.org/10.58079/usui

Das könnte dich auch interessieren …

2 Antworten

  1. 14. Mai 2020

    […] the following interview, which was first published on 22 October 2019 by Max Weber Foundation (https://trafo.hypotheses.org/19828), she talks about her previous and ongoing […]

  2. 27. Mai 2024

    […] the following interview, which was first published on 22 October 2019 by Max Weber Foundation (https://trafo.hypotheses.org/19828), she talks about her previous and ongoing […]

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Diese Website verwendet Akismet, um Spam zu reduzieren. Erfahre mehr darüber, wie deine Kommentardaten verarbeitet werden.

Suche in OpenEdition Search

Sie werden weitergeleitet zur OpenEdition Search